Cancer Reports

 

FREE TICKET

Exciting New Discoveries  Help You  Live Longer and Cancer Free!

Learn critical health secrets giant corporations don't want you to know.

This new information may save your life ….  but only if you put it into practice!  To fully understand its significance requires some basic knowledge.  Let's begin by reviewing the way cancer is treated in North America and the UK today.

One of the most frightening things a person can hear from their doctor is, "You have cancer".  This is because we all know people who have been effected by this terrible disease.  We may have friends or family members who have suffered and died from cancer.  We may also know people who have contracted cancer and survived, but we also know the price some of them paid in chemotherapy induced illness and hair loss, in physical disfigurement from surgery, or in side effects from radiation treatments.

The purpose of this report is not to scare you, nor is it to provide medical advice.  Ultimately, only you can decide what is best for you, whether you are trying to prevent cancer or if you already have cancer and are seeking treatment.  To make good decisions, you must first have good information.  If you want to reduce your chance of getting cancer, you must know something of what may cause cancer.  You must know how you can minimize your potential exposure and how you can support your body's natural abilities to protect itself.  In this report, we will attempt to provide some of that information.  The first step will be to expose a few myths.

 

·        Myth No. 1:  We are winning the battle with cancer, and survival rates are much better today than in the past.   

FALSE.  Cancer has become epidemic, effecting massive numbers of people in all social and economic groups.  It is now the 2nd leading cause of death in North America, exceeded only by heart disease.  The American Cancer Society says that 1/2 of all men and 1/3 of all women in our country today will develop some form of cancer in their lifetime.  This is a massive increase over the 1 person in 80 who contracted cancer 100 years ago.  This year, about 1,200,000 new cancer cases will be diagnosed and added to the millions who already have cancer, with the anticipated loss of more than 500,000 lives.  (Over 1,500 people in the U.S. die every day from cancer.)

In spite of massive investments in research, cancer rates are increasing among all age groups, including children, whose rate of increase is nearly 1% per year according to the American Cancer Institute.  In some parts of the world, cancer already affects 1 in every 2 people, and the trend continues to get worse.  Eventually the rate could approach 100%.

Although small improvements have occurred in treating some cancers, the overall rate of recovery for cancer patients has changed very little over the past 50 years.  The average cancer survival rate was about 50% in 1950, and it is still about 50% today.  For African-Americans, the survival rate in 1950 was under 40%, and it also remains about the same today.

 

·        Myth No. 2:  Chemotherapy is very effective in treating cancer and in saving the lives of cancer victims.

FALSE .  Over the years, many dramatic claims have been made by pharmaceutical companies and other members of the cancer establishment regarding drug based treatments for cancer.  Today, chemotherapy is the most common form of cancer treatment.  If such successful results were actually being achieved, improvements could readily be observed in the survival rates.  Yet, survival rates remain basically unchanged.      

Chemotherapy consists of a mixture of highly toxic drugs which are given the patient in a series of treatments over a period of time.  Research shows that chemotherapy can often cause a partial or even complete shrinkage of a tumour, although this shrinkage does not necessarily prolong expected survival.  In fact, studies have found that the cancer sometimes returns even more aggressively than before, because the chemotherapy has created more resistant cells.  In addition, a strongly negative side effect of chemo is that it can severely damage the body's immune system as well as the kidneys and liver.  Some patients will die from these complications alone

A good indication of the effectiveness of chemotherapy can be found in polls surveying cancer doctors regarding what they would chose for themselves if they were diagnosed with cancer.  Many have stated they would not chose chemotherapy for themselves due to its ineffectiveness and its unacceptable levels of toxicity.  Still doctors continue to administer chemotherapy because they do not have approved medical alternatives.  The fact is there are large profits to be made in administering chemotherapy, whether it is actually effective or not.

·        Myth No. 3:  If I am sick or injured, I want to be in the hospital where I know I will be well taken care of.

  WHAT?????)  We have wonderful facilities in this country housing the latest in medical equipment and staffed with highly dedicated professionals.  When we need to go to the hospital, we are certainly glad they are there.  However, statistics show there is significant danger associated with being a hospital patient.

In 1993, Ralph Nader's consumer watchdog organization released its findings from a three year study of American hospitals.  They reported that an astounding 300,000 people die each year in hospitals due to errors in diagnosis, treatment, medication, surgery, and other forms of medical malpractice.  The Journal of the American Medical Association, in its July 2000 issue, confirmed the figure at a conservative 250,000 deaths per year.  This means that in American hospitals, medical errors kill five times as many people each year as there were American service personnel killed in the entire Viet Nam war.  And those service people were dodging bullets!  The frightening thing is we are following very close behind the American example here in the UK.

Even when prescription drugs are properly administered, there are dangers involved, whether or not you are in a hospital.  Millions of Americans have harmful reactions to prescription drugs every year, and an estimated 100,000 of those reactions result in death.

Obviously, the best way to eliminate the dangers associated with hospitalisation and prescription drugs is to take better care of yourself.  Stay healthy and avoid accidents, and you will not be needing either one.

·        Myth No. 4:  My doctor always knows what is best for me.

(NOT NECESSARILY)  Paul Winter, author of The Cancell Home Page, writes:  "It is not likely that any doctor knowingly surpresses a cancer cure to protect his business or career.  But every doctor has his or her own ideas about the best treatment based on what they have learned.  The pharmaceutical companies however have an extremely strong influence over what medical doctors are taught.  Doctors are too busy to dig into the statistics of cancer treatments, so they assume that what they were taught in school or what is demonstrated in the pages of briefing journals is the best treatment.  They cannot afford to suspect that these treatments are only best for the pharmaceutical companies that influence their institutions of higher learning."

Dr. John Diamond and Dr. Lee Cowden, in their book titled Alternative Medicine: The Definitive Guide to Cancer, give this scathing indictment of the cancer industry:  "To the cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit centre.  The actual clinical and scientific evidence does not support the claims of the cancer industry.  Conventional cancer treatments are in place as the law of the land not because they heal the best, but because they pay the best.  Decades of the politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and will continue to do so unless you wake up to their reality."

Why is it that the scandals concerning cancer treatment remain muted?  Mostly because doctors have not yet fully realized the fraudulent nature of the cancer industry and the greed which drives it.  Paul Winter explains: "Even if you have the best doctors, their information about alternative cancer treatments is probably incorrect.  Doctors are so busy that they must rely on the summaries of medical research or testing.  These summaries are usually prepared by institutions that oppose alternative treatments.  If you carefully research other alternative cancer treatments, you will find the same kind of disinformation.  How and why this happens is thoroughly explained in the book, The Cancer Industry, by Dr. Ralph Moss."

·         Myth No. 5:  Massive research is underway to determine how to prevent cancer.

(FALSE)  Cancer is the basis for a huge industry dominated by large corporations that exist for the primary purpose of earning profits and creating dividends for stockholders.  In the U.S. alone, cancer is a $200 billion per year industry.  There are more people in the UK and the USA, earning a living from cancer than dying from it.  Eliminating cancer or dramatically reducing the procedures required to treat cancer would create a very large economic loss for the cancer industry.  Therefore, only minimal research is being conducted on cancer prevention.

There are two main sources of funding for cancer related research in the United States.  The largest is the National Cancer Institute, which distributes about $3 Billion of tax money for cancer research annually.  Of this huge sum, only 2-3% is allocated to researching the prevention of cancer.  The other organization funding cancer research is the American Cancer Society, which collects about $700 Million in donations annually and spends virtually nothing on cancer prevention.  Pharmaceutical companies, which fund their own research, have no incentive to research cancer prevention, because all the profit potential is in treating cancer and not in preventing it.

You may be shocked to learn that officers and directors of pharmaceutical companies, petrochemical companies, and tobacco companies serve as officers, board members, or directors of some of the largest cancer research organizations.  Some are either current or former directors of the American Cancer Society also.  From these positions, they are able to guide and control how cancer research money is spent.

Despite massive evidence that cancer is a metabolic disease which can be effectively treated with specialized nutritional therapy, and despite extensive documentation over many years of numerous cancer types responding favourably to nutrition based protocols, there is virtually no public or private funding available for research in this area.  In fact, professionals who have spoken out in presenting such information or who have advocated a nutritional approach to treating cancer patients have been ridiculed, slandered, and in some cases, even driven from their practice.  One needs to ask why.

The cancer establishment is opposed to nutrition based cancer treatment for the same reason it opposes researching cancer prevention.  There is no significant money to be made with either approach.  Pharmaceutical companies' motives are profit driven, and to control profits, they only market formulas they can patent.  Natural ingredients, as found in nutritional products, cannot be patented.  Therefore, to protect their profitable business of making patented cancer drugs, their solution has been to harass anyone promoting a non-drug therapy.  Government regulators and leaders of medical associations who owe much of their existence to the pharmaceutical companies fall right in line to create a united front of opposition.

One result of this opposition is that the emphasis in cancer research is almost never on prevention and always on CURE.  The people who are directing cancer research have a vested interest in keeping the scientists away from the study of cancer prevention and focused on drug cures that can be patented, marketed, and so on.  Some people believe the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in total collusion with this because they have set up a system that requires hundreds of millions of dollars and 10 years or more of testing to get a new drug approved.  This high cost prohibits all but the few largest and richest pharmaceutical companies from participating in the FDA approval process.  For individuals or small companies with limited funding, it is impossible.

 

 

One of the characteristics of cancer is that it is related to our advances in life-style as a civilized society.  In past centuries, cancer was a rare disease, and it is still rare in isolated societies that are insulated from contact with the products that are so common in our world.  So how can this be?

Cancer is not considered an infectious disease caused by a virus or bacteria, or by a "germ" of any kind.  It is not a disease that you can "catch" from someone else.  Rather it is a disease caused by the body's natural immune systems being gradually overwhelmed by toxins or other carcinogens (cancer causing substances) through exposure over time.  This breakdown of the immune system may be accentuated by nutritional deficiencies due to poor eating habits, a depletion of essential trace elements and minerals in our food due to non sustainable farming practices and/or an over dependence on processed foods.  As the body loses its ability to rid itself of the toxic chemicals, cell mutations occur which reproduce and grow, gradually replacing healthy cells.  In time, the damage caused by the mutated cells becomes so extensive that critical life processes are interrupted and death occurs.

Cancer can occur in many forms and locations throughout the body.  And, some cancers are more frequently found amongst people in geographic areas or among certain population groups.  Some cancers are faster growing than others and some are more difficult to treat than others, but all are similar because they involve the proliferation of mutated cells.

Scientists agree, at least 80% of all cancers, are caused by toxins, carcinogens, and other damaging factors in our environment that we are repeatedly exposed to. Over a period of many years repeated exposure to these chemicals and toxins, although the exposure may be small at any one time, the effects accumulate similar to the long drawn out process involved in lung cancer with cigarette smokers.  Toxins build up if the body can't remove them, and dangerous radiation causes continual damage at the cellular level.  Eventually the body can no longer resist the effects of these harmful elements, and mutated cells begin to form.  This is the beginning of cancer.

For most of us, our level of exposure to potentially cancer causing factors is determined by the choices we make.  However, deciding to make changes in our life-style and reduce our exposure to these toxins and carcinogens requires a level of awareness that most people don't have.  We must first know the sources of the problems before we can choose to avoid them.

What are common examples of cancer causing factors in our environment that most people would be aware of?

There are two common causes of cancer with which we are all familiar due to extensive public education campaigns conducted over many years.  These are both causes of cancer, which are based on life-style choices.  In both cases, it is the person's actions, which allow the damaging factors to be introduced into the cells of the body.  The first of these involves the carcinogens found in cigarette smoke, which is inhaled into the lungs.  This is a good example for our discussion.

It is a commonly accepted fact that smoking increases a person's chance of developing cancer as well as heart disease and other illnesses.  Not all smokers develop cancer, but their likelihood of getting cancer increases with the number of years they have been smoking.  This is entirely consistent with the concept that the build up of toxins, in this case from cigarette smoke, gradually overwhelms the body's ability to remove them, causing cells to mutate into cancer.  Some “body’s” are stronger in their ability to resist these toxins than others.  Some people despite smoking still lead a healthy lifestyle, eat plenty of fresh fruit and vegetables and supplement their diet with anti-oxidants and minerals and will not develop cancer.  However the vast majority will develop cancer in the long run if heart disease doesn’t claim them first!  We can protect ourselves against this cause of cancer by not smoking and by avoiding prolonged exposure to 2nd hand smoke.

Another example, which we are all familiar with, is skin cancer, which is tied to excessive exposure to intense sunlight.  The sun's rays are composed of A, B, and C rays.  The B rays cause sunburn on the surface of the skin, and most sun block lotions will reduce exposure to B rays.  The effects of C rays are largely unknown.  However, we do know that A rays penetrate deeply into the layers of the skin and damage cells well below the surface.  This can lead to wrinkling, a leather-like texture, and skin cancer.  Here again, some body’s are better able to resist this damage than others, but prolonged exposure gives an increased likelihood of skin cancer developing.  We protect ourselves from sun damage by limiting our exposure, staying covered as much as possible, and seeking out a high quality lotion that blocks the full spectrum of A, B, and C solar rays.   (Conversely many over the counter sun block creams and lotions contain known carcinogens which, when used over time, just like cigarette smoke will cause lung cancer, the toxins contained in sunscreens will predispose sun bathers to melanoma! Ed’s note)

We are bombarded daily with toxins in our environment.  Many of which are very difficult to avoid.  However most people unknowingly use products every day, containing potentially harmful ingredients…. Toxic ingredients that are readily absorbed into our bodies! Giant corporations continually promote these highly profitable product lines through massive advertising budgets to keep sales volumes increasing.  You will be surprised to learn that products containing these toxic and potentially carcinogenic ingredients are applied to babies beginning the day they are born, and most people personally continue using products with these same ingredients daily throughout their lives.  Have you ever wondered or stopped to really think about why so many young children develop cancer at such a tender age? 

Often these children have been unwittingly exposed to carcinogens from the day they were born, right up until they eventually die of cancer!  It is an absolute tragedy that well documented research, pointing to indisputable scientific evidence that continual exposure to low levels of these so-called “safe” chemicals causes cancer, is basically covered up and not publicised. I am referring to ingredients in almost all personal care and cosmetic products on the market.  Products you buy off the shelf from your local store and you and your family use not knowing the long term dangers of doing so.

For example, have you ever read the warning label on your toothpaste?  Most people have not.  It is required by law in the USA on almost all toothpaste including children's toothpaste, and says, "Do not swallow.  If you swallow more than the amount normally used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control centre immediately."  Why is this warning required?  It's the products toxic ingredients; fluoride and sodium lauryl sulfate and sodium hydroxide.  In fact, there are enough of these ingredients in just a 4 ounce tube of toothpaste to kill a small child.  Yet here in the UK we aren’t even warned of the potential toxicity of these known carcinogens in everyday products like toothpaste.  The question begs to be asked.  Why aren’t we warned?

Are you shocked?  To put such potentially harmful ingredients in an adult product is bad enough, but to put it in a children's product, complete with a fruit or candy flavour and a cartoon character on the container, seems totally irresponsible.  It is tantamount to a health disaster the likes of which has never been seen before!  How could our governments allow this to happen?  This is only the beginning of what should be a national scandal.

In a September 5, 1997, U.S. Senate hearing on a bill to reform how the  FDA oversees the cosmetics industry (which includes all types of personal care products including toothpaste), the following information was presented.  "A study by the General Accounting Office reported that more than 125 ingredients used in cosmetics are suspected of causing cancer.  Twenty cosmetics ingredients may cause adverse effects to the nervous system, including headaches, drowsiness, and convulsions.  Twenty cosmetic ingredients are suspected of causing birth defects.  The GAO concluded that 'cosmetics are being marketed in the United States which may pose a serious hazard to the public.'"

In that same hearing, Senator Kennedy made the following statement.  "In 1988, our colleague, then-Congressman Wyden held landmark hearings looking at the safety of cosmetics.  The industry gave his subcommittee a list of 2,983 chemicals used in cosmetics.  The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health at NIH analysed those 2,983 chemicals and found that 884 cosmetic ingredients had been reported to the Government as toxic substances.  We've known for 10 years that a third of cosmetic chemicals are toxic but we've done nothing to strengthen Federal consumer protections." 

The complete text of this testimony can be found on the following internet site. http://www.senate.gov/member/ma/kennedy/general/statements/970905fdacosmetics.html

Most people are surprised to learn that the FDA (and the Dept of Health in the UK) has virtually no control over the $20 billion per year cosmetics industry, which is bigger than the alcohol and tobacco industries combined.  These facts were pointed out in a February 1999 series of investigative reports on the network TV program, CBS This Morning.  In the final report of the week-long series, they showed a stack of books about 18 inches high.  Reporter Roberta Bascomb said, "These books include all the regulations enforced by the FDA.  In all these thousands of pages, there are less than 30 pages total regulating the $20 billion cosmetics industry.  There are more pages pertaining to the labelling of canned fruit!"

The basis for the cosmetics industry is to create "hope" and to market "image" through massive advertising.  They sell inexpensive products at huge mark ups. Even with very expensive name-brand products, the cap on the bottle normally costs more than the ingredients inside!  This creates massive profits, which are reinvested in advertising to create more sales and more profits. 

If you have ever looked at a woman's magazine, you will realize that it is hard to find the articles because of all the advertising.  It is as if the entire magazine is just all advertising, most of which is for cosmetic and personal care products, and the articles are an afterthought.  Only an extremely profitable industry could afford this amount of advertising.  With so much advertising revenue at stake, don't expect any magazine to print an expose' on the hype, false promises, and potentially harmful ingredients employed by this industry.  It would be like the owners of the magazine digging there own grave, because no cosmetic manufacturer would ever advertise with them again.

The only magazines you will find that do print the truth about toxic chemicals in our toiletries, cosmetics and food are not what you would call mainstream publications.  Generally they are funded by subscription only and never accept advertising in any form.  This way they can print honest and factual information without having major vested interests leaning on them.  However it is unfortunate indeed, that truthful publications such as these, are sought out only by the people who are well aware of these problems anyway.  The general public blithely carries on, unaware of the massive cover up perpetrated by these all powerful vested interests with massive financial clout.

By the same token, don't expect significant regulation by government agencies to restrict the actions of cosmetic companies and personal care product manufacturers.  (It hardly seems appropriate to call them personal care product manufacturers!  The only thing they care about is the bottom line and how much profit they can report back to their shareholders). There is just too much money available for political contributions and lobbying efforts designed to protect the special interests of this extremely powerful industry.

 

·         If the government won't protect us, then we need to protect ourselves.  What are some of the ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products that are potentially harmful?

In looking at potentially harmful ingredients in personal care products, we will not attempt to review all 884 which the federal government has identified as toxic and a potential danger.  Instead we will focus on a few of the most commonly recognized.  And we will divide our list into three parts for easier identification of the risks involved.

Ingredient List #1:  The following ingredients have either been identified as potentially carcinogenic by themselves or when combined with other commonly used ingredients.  Having exceedingly small molecules allows them to be easily absorbed into the body.

You don’t need to be mental giant to work out that low-level exposure to toxic chemicals over  a long period of time may have the same devastating effect as perhaps cigarette smoke does on the majority of smokers!  Really it is a “NO BRAINER”!

 

Ingredient List #2:  

The following ingredients are not necessarily carcinogenic, but have been identified as potentially harmful for a variety of other reasons.

Shocked?  You should be!

Ingredient List #3:  

The following ingredients are commonly used in cosmetic and skin care products.  All have molecules much too large to be absorbed into the skin.  Instead they may suffocate the skin and block normal skin respiration by forming a film that traps moisture, toxins and waste while preventing the intake of oxygen.  The result can be unhealthy skin, an aging appearance, and increased toxin levels.

•  Bentonite:  A porous clay commonly used in cosmetic foundations.  Bentonite, which expands to many times its dry volume as it absorbs water, may clog pores and suffocate the skin.

•  Collagen:  Too large a protein to be absorbed, collagen is normally "bovine collagen" (scrapings from animal hides) or "avian collagen" (ground chicken feet).  These collagens stay on the skin's surface forming a film that may suffocate it.

•  Kaolin:  A fine white clay used in cosmetics, kaolin may smother and weaken the skin similar to bentonite.

•  Mineral Oil:  Derived from petroleum, mineral oil may block normal respiration and suffocate the skin.

•  Petrolatum:  A petroleum-based grease, petrolatum exhibits the same potentially harmful properties as Mineral Oil.

Despite the known dangers associated with many of the ingredients in cosmetic and personal care products, manufacturers continue to use them.  This is because they are inexpensive and can be used to create products with a look, feel, and smell that can be marketed successfully.  "These toxic chemicals don't have to be in personal care products," says consumer advocate Ralph Nader.  "Yet corporations continue to expose people to health hazards unnecessarily."

The U.S. government has no program (nor the UK govt) to appropriately regulate the use of synthetic chemicals.  Only 3 percent of the 75,000 commercial chemicals used today have been tested for safety, according to the article "Cancer, Inc." in the September/October 1999 issue of Sierra Magazine.  Importantly none of these chemicals have ever been tested or researched for synergising effects.  This is when one or more chemicals react in the body to each other and cause  a synergised reaction or combination of reactions.  To carry out research into the synergising effects of chemicals in every possible combination is completely beyond the capacity of the entire scientific resources available in the world today.  It would take literally hundreds of years with teams of thousands of research scientists working around the clock to test all the combinations of the 75,000 chemicals in use.  

You should be starting to appreciate by now, this will never happen!

Industry observers say that of those chemicals, which are known to be toxic, some are totally unregulated, and others are allowed to be used in formulations if they meet regulated “safe levels”.  These experts say that while a single “safe level” of exposure to a chemical like sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) may not cause lasting harm, continued use may become quite dangerous.  Chemical accumulations in cells and fatty tissues can reach very harmful levels. Just like the toxins in cigarette smoke accumulate in the lungs of smokers.

How does the human body deal with the accumulation of toxic chemicals, and what problems can they cause?

Our bodies are designed to defend themselves against foreign substances that could cause potential harm.  This becomes obvious when we consider that, in most cases, limited exposure to harmful toxins and carcinogens does not immediately translate into cancer. For example, people who have smoked their first cigarette are not likely to get cancer from it.  However, the longer someone smokes, the more likely they are to be diagnosed with the disease.  This is because of the onslaught of toxins over time from continued smoking, and the body's eventual loss of its ability to resist, allowing mutated cells to form.  A similar process occurs with hundreds, perhaps thousands of other toxins and carcinogens as well.  Not to mention the synergising effects of chemicals we touched on earlier

The removal of toxins from the body is a natural process occurring at the cellular level.  And since this process is a natural reaction by the systems of the body, its effectiveness is directly related to the overall health of the body.  It stands to reason that healthy cells would be more able to defend themselves against attack than would unhealthy cells.  Therefore, maintaining proper nutrition and supplementing your diet with adequate levels of trace minerals and anti-oxidants is an important factor in maximizing the removal of toxins and opposing the accumulations that could lead to mutated cells.

Cancer is a complex disease, and the content of this report is a simplified explanation, but it will be helpful in your general understanding of the issues.  The following is a list of some of the differences between healthy cells and cancer cells:

The body has two natural avenues of defence.  The first is the immune system, in which white blood cells recognize, kill, and remove invading bacteria, toxins, mutated cells, etc.  In order to kill foreign invaders or rogue cells, the immune system must first be alerted and find them.  The protein shield surrounding a cancer cell mimics a normal cell and hides it from the immune system.

The pancreas produces two enzymes (trypsin and chymotrypsin) which are designed to dissolve proteins.  In healthy bodies, they would normally dissolve the protein surrounding cancer cells.  However, these enzymes may not be available in sufficient quantity.  For people with diminished levels of pancreatic enzymes, their bodies may not have enough left for dissolving the protein around their cancer cells.  Often what is believed to happen, continual exposure to toxic chemicals weakens the body’s ability to produce the specific enzyme needed to remove the chemical or toxic invader completely from the system.  This in itself acts as a stressor on the body and further reduces the natural ability we have to remove many chemicals and toxins out of the body. 

This break down in the specific enzymes manufactured by the body is usually first noticed by sufferers as tiredness.  The first line of defence against invasion by toxic chemicals is for the body to produce specific enzymes.  However if they are not being produced in sufficient quantities a reaction will take place, which results in feelings of extreme tiredness.  If you are experiencing more than a normal sense of tiredness, then take this as a warning from your body it is struggling to cope with a toxic overload.  By sleeping the body is able to direct all its recuperation powers into eliminating toxins and rebuilding cells.  It is a well-documented fact, we die if we are deprived of sleep indefinitely, so always ensure your body has adequate sleep to give it every chance to rebuild and cope with daily exposure to our toxic environment.

This is a gross over simplification of the processes involved but it should give you some idea of the complexity of the problem involving toxic chemicals.   As long as a cancer cell is surrounded by the protein shield and the body has lost it’s ability to manufacture the specific enzyme to dissolve it, the body's immune system will not recognize it and will not attack.  Cancer now has a foothold in what was once a healthy body.

The second line of defence are nitrilosides, which are nutrients obtained by eating certain fruits, vegetables, and grains.  When nitrilosides contact a normal cell, they feed the cell.  However, when nitrilosides contact a cancer cell, they can react with the special enzyme in the cell, causing the cell to die.  

The reaction to nitrilosides is target-specific, because only cancer cells have the specific enzyme that causes their own destruction.  Therefore, researchers say that eating a diet high in nitrilosides may help give your body the nutritional ammunition it needs to fight cancer naturally.  That's why they recommend we eat seven servings of fruits and vegetables daily.  Although we are told to eat seven servings of fruit and vegetables daily very few people do.  Worse the fruit and vegetables are grown using toxic organo-phosphate chemicals to keep pests at bay and harvested from generally mineral depleted soils.  Often they are stored using anti-fungal treatments and other chemicals to prolong their shelf life.  So the very things we are being told to eat to maintain our health could also be contributing greatly to our overall toxicity and declining health.

Although cancer can occur at any stage in life, the probability of developing cancer increases proportionately with age.  Often cancer will go undetected for many years because the body effectively continues to fight it.  In fact, researchers believe that most of us will have the beginnings of cancer multiple times during our life.  If our defence mechanisms are functioning properly, we fight off the cancer and never know we had it.  But if those defence mechanisms are down, the result can be an actively growing cancer.  

What about people who won't take supplements because insurance won't pay for them?

It's true that some people have this attitude.  They say they will save money by not using supplements now.  Then when they get sick, their insurance company will pay their medical bills.  This is an incredibly short-sighted approach!  In fact, it makes about as much sense as driving recklessly without wearing seat belts, and then justifying it all by saying, "If I'm in an accident, the doctors will fix me up, and my insurance will pay for it."  What is the price you would pay in pain and suffering?  What if the doctors can't save you?  Your chance of dying from cancer is a lot greater than from a car accident!  Invest in taking care of your body, it's the only one you will ever have.  Even though doctors strive to you cannot replace parts of your body without major cost and limitations on you for the future. 

What are some of the latest discoveries that can help our body fight cancer naturally?

Scientists say about 80% of cancers are related to toxins and carcinogens entering the body and invading healthy cells.  These cancers may be prevented through proper lifestyle choices and nutrition.  Researchers have isolated powerful nutrients which have proven effective in supporting the body's natural efforts to rid itself of toxins and carcinogens, and in some cases, the body's efforts to reverse their damaging effects.

 It becomes obvious why giant corporations don't want you to have this information.  The more people who utilize this report and insist on only having safe healthy products and foods, the more those companies' profits will suffer!

Does any major company produce high quality personal care products containing no toxins, carcinogens, or other harmful ingredients? What about products to maximize health and longevity by utilizing the very latest in powerful nutritional discoveries?  Are such products available at an affordable cost?  Yes, but at this time, there is only one company in the world, which offers a complete product line free of toxic chemicals.  This company is recognized around the globe for its achievements, and all their products carry the endorsement of the Cancer Prevention Coalition.

To obtain information on personal care and cosmetic products containing no harmful ingredients, or to obtain information on specific products to support your body's cellular health, contact the person who gave you this report!

Cancer Reports